Drawing for ECONFIDENCE

USPTO serial 79008928

ECONFIDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174266Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ECONFIDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T.J. Weigell

Charles T.J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Dyestuffs for textilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 21, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 13, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 8, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance