USPTO serial 79008928
ECONFIDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ECONFIDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
DyStar Colours Deutschland GmbH
DD
DyStar Colours Distribution GmbH
Raunheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T.J. Weigell
Charles T.J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Dyestuffs for textiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
- Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
- Other trademarks owned by DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG
- Other trademarks owned by DyStar Colours Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DyStar Colours Distribution GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named ECONFIDENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |