Drawing for RESOUND OPEN

USPTO serial 79008930

RESOUND OPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158894Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESOUND OPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville, Esq.

Anna W. Manville, Esq. ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 Twelfth Street, NWIP DOCKETINGWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Hearing aidsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 5, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 25, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 5, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance