USPTO serial 79008992
ARWEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARWEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Nipper
STEPHEN M NIPPER DYKAS, SHAVER & NIPPER LLPPO BOX 877BOISE, ID 83701-0877UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabric impervious to gases for aeronautical balloons, fabric of imitation animal skins, fiberglass fabrics for textile use; net curtains, shower curtains, bath linen, bed linen, bed sheets, bedspreads, pillow cases, bolting cloth, table linen, namely coasters, calico, covers for cushions; quilts, bed blankets; towels, hand towels of textile, bath towels; handkerchiefs of textile, textile napkins for removing make-up; cloth banners, cloth flags, cloth pennants, cloth labels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |