CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KSC

USPTO serial 79009074

KSC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3098355Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2006
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with KSC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

Andrew Roppel HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749Attn. Trademark DocketingDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for agriculture, horticulture [ and forestry ] , namely, fertilizers, [ chemical preparations for the treatment of seeds, ] soil conditioners, plant growth regulators.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 21, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 30, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 1, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 30, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 30, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 22, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 16, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance