USPTO serial 79009152
SO..?WHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3145670Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SO..?WHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena Michev
GRAHAM CAMPAIGN36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletry articles, namely, emery boards; hair care products, namely, shampoo, hair conditioner, hair care mousse, hair gel, hair spray, hair wax, hair dyes; perfume, cosmetics, personal deodorants, perfuming sachets; body lotions; shower gels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Debonair Trading Internacional Lda.
- Other trademarks owned by Debonair Trading Internacional Lda.
- Other trademarks owned by Debonair Trading Internacional Lda.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SO..?WHAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 29, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |