USPTO serial 79009172
TDP SCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TDP SCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL USE, PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL OR VETERINARY USE TO TEST THE SECONDARY EFFECTS OF A DRUG OR A MOLECULE ON A MOLECULAR BODY, CULTURES OF MICROORGANISMS FOR MEDICAL AND VETERINARY USE TO TEST THE SECONDARY EFFECTS OF A DRUG OR MOLECULE ON A MOLECULAR BODY, BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL OR VETERINARY USE, BIOLOGICAL MEDIA FOR KEEPING LIVE ORGANS AND TISSUE ALIVE TO TEST THE SECONDARY EFFECTS OF A DRUG OR MOLECULE ON A MOLECULAR BODY; NUTRITIVE SUBSTANCES FOR MICROORGANISMS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR CARRYING OUT TESTS AND SIMULATIONS ON MOLECULES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL OR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH SERVICES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PURPOSES; SCIENTIFIC AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH, EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL BY MEANS OF MOLECULAR TESTS WHICH WILL BE USED AS MEDICINES TO EVALUATE THEIR SECONDARY EFFECTS ON THE ORGANISM AND PARTICULARLY THE RISKS OF WAVE BURST ARRHYTHMIA; TECHNICAL RESEARCH, CHEMICAL ANALYSES, CHEMICAL RESEARCH CONCERNING COLLECTED LIVE ORGANS AND TISSUES; TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF MEASURING OF ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS, NAMELY, VITAL PARAMETERS; SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, INSTALLATION AND UPDATING OF SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |