Drawing for IPNO

USPTO serial 79009179

IPNO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162813Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPNO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natasha N. Reed

Natasha N. Reed FOLEY HOAG LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014[ Precious metals and their alloys; jewelry; precious stones; ] horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 12, 2019NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 19, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 26, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance