USPTO serial 79009304
DCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199005Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
BE
Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
Nazareth, BE
Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
DE
ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
BE
Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Motor and engines not for land vehicles; chains and chain wheels for use in electrically-powered machinery and machinery powered by internal combustion engines; machines and motor parts, namely, chains and chain wheels for industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks owned by KettenWulf Betriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ketten wulf, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named DCS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |