Drawing for NORLIGHT PROGETTO LUCE

USPTO serial 79009355

NORLIGHT PROGETTO LUCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORLIGHT PROGETTO LUCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting appliances, indoor and outdoor lighting appliances, lighting appliances for residential use, for industries, for emergencies, security lights, lighting for hospitals, for sterile environments, for display areas, for decorative use, for urban furniture, for tunnels, for swimming pools, for monuments, for gardens, for roadsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Construction, installation, repair and maintenance services for lighting systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design services, supplied by architects and engineers, in the lighting systems sectorSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 9, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 9, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance