Drawing for POLY+

USPTO serial 79009487

POLY+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085655Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLY+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

THILO C AGTHE WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 WALL ST 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics, in particular for the production of moulds for confectionerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Moulds as parts of machines for the production of confectionerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Hand-operated devices for dividing ice-cream into portions, namely, ice-cream scoopsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 13, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance