USPTO serial 79009489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A SMITH
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Grinding machines; machines for grinding cardboard | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |