Drawing for OWS

USPTO serial 79009496

OWS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162815Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OWS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, adhesives used in industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colorants for use in the manufacture of cars or parts thereof; mordants; dyes; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artistsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
003Bleaching preparations; General purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive liquids and powders; soapsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
004Industrial oils and greases; all purpose lubricants; automotive lubricants; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels, namely motor spiritSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 13, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 13, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 5, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance