USPTO serial 79009526
MAGNETOFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3174268Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNETOFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely chemical preparations for the placement of nucleic acid sequences within cells | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Christian Bergemann
- Other trademarks owned by Christian Bergemann
- Other trademarks owned by Christian Bergemann
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Christian Plank
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Christian Plank
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Christian Plank
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MAGNETOFECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |