Drawing for NIKOIL

USPTO serial 79009527

NIKOIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIKOIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
036Insurance; financial affairs; monetary affairs; real estate affairsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Technical research; computer programming; legal servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 22, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance