Drawing for T THUNIT

USPTO serial 79009577

T THUNIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3183953Status 707Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with T THUNIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tina M. Dorr

Tina M. Dorr Barnes & Thornburg3340 Peachtree Rd NESuite 2900Atlanta, GA 30326-1092

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Sheets of rubber for footwear solesACTIVE—
025[ Rubber soles [and heels] for footwear ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 202671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 8, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 5, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 2, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance