USPTO serial 79009614
LE CHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LE CHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely ready-made clothing for women, men and children, footwear (excluding orthopedic footwear), boots, slippers, shoes, headgear, dressing gowns, headbands (clothing), boas (worn around the neck), mufflers, socks, layettes, hoods (clothing), shawls, belts (clothing), wet suits for diving, skiing, neckties, corsets (girdles), sashes for wear, pelerines (clothing), stoles (furs), scarves, bathing caps, sandals, knitted caps, gloves (clothing), body linen, jerseys, mantillas, stockings, mittens, ear muffs (clothing), bowties, textile diapers, textile babies' diaper pants, neck scarves, pareos, furs (clothing), pajamas, soles, underwear, heels, suspenders, bathing suits, clothing for gymnastics and sports, veils (clothing), skirts, shirts, trousers, jackets, knitwear (clothing) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |