Drawing for MONTE-CARLO SPA

USPTO serial 79009656

MONTE-CARLO SPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTE-CARLO SPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, body deodorants and hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation; services in connection with the reservation of hotel rooms by travel agencies or brokersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Sanitary and beauty care for human beingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance