USPTO serial 79009708
GO82020
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3148875Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO82020?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LEBOW
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software containing programming which permits access to the services delivered to mobile phones; pre-recorded electronic media, namely, CD-ROMS and computer software featuring voicemail messages; downloadable games, namely, gambling, casino gaming and betting; downloadable ringtones and graphics for mobile phones; downloadable digital musical sound recordings; downloadable electronic publications relating to games and quizzes, provided on-line from a database, Internet or other electronic network | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among mobile phone users concerning areas of general interest; chat line services, namely, sending, receiving and forwarding messages in the form of text, audio, graphic images, or video, or a combination of the aforementioned formats; providing online chat rooms for transmission of messages among users with a view to meeting or establishing a personal relationship; provision of information and advice relating to chat line and chat room services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services provided on-line from a computer, the Internet, and other electronic networks, namely, games; providing interactive quizzes; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable pre-recorded digital music via the Internet; gambling, casino gaming and betting services; on-line and telephone gambling, gaming and betting services; providing information and advice on on-line computer games, gambling, casino gaming, betting, on-line gaming and on-line interactive quizzes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STREAM MOBILE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by STREAM MOBILE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by STREAM MOBILE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GO82020
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |