USPTO serial 79009741
APOLLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3183956Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APOLLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Cominolli
Elizabeth A. Cominolli Barclay Damon, LLP125 East Jefferson StreetBarclay Damon TowerSyracuse, NY 13202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Lasers, for medical purposes, namely for patient alignment, for radiotherapy and for nuclear medicine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen
- Other trademarks owned by LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen
- Other trademarks owned by LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named APOLLO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |