USPTO serial 79009749
LINATOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINATOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | NON-MEDICINAL FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, NAMELY, HAXELNUT AND SUNFLOWER OIL | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |