Drawing for MÖLLER MEDICAL

USPTO serial 79009759

MÖLLER MEDICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MÖLLER MEDICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, and dental apparatus and instruments for use in neurosurgery, surgery of the thorax and heart, cosmetic surgery, radiology and oncology, geriatrics, palliative medicine, blood transfusions, hemodialysis, analytic and diagnostic medicine, keyhole surgery/endoscopy, anesthetics/emergency medical aid, gynecology, surgery of the eyes, pneumology, otorhinolaryngology; apparatus and instruments for veterinary surgerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance