Drawing for B'SEEN

USPTO serial 79009781

B'SEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158904Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B'SEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM E. MARAMES,

WILLIAM E MARAMES, ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Safety equipment, namely, flashing safety lights and beacon lights; road safety products for pets, namely, reflectors which are clipped to the pet's collarSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Lamps, lights, night lights and flashlightsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035AdvertisingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 14, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 12, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance