Drawing for FULL CHOKE

USPTO serial 79009825

FULL CHOKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3059223Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 14, 2006
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL CHOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY H. BEGLER Nixon Peabody401 Ninth Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eau-de-Cologne, eaux de toilette, pomades and lotions for cosmetic use; cosmetic creams, skin care cosmetics, essential oils for personal use, cleansing milks, talcum powder for toiletry use, cosmetic suntan preparations, sun blocks; soaps; shaving products, namely, shaving soaps, shaving creams, gels and foams, after-shave lotions; deodorants for personal use, deodorant soaps; shampoos, hair lotions, bath salts not for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 10, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance