Drawing for LA POULE BLANCHE

USPTO serial 79009843

LA POULE BLANCHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148878Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LA POULE BLANCHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. David Starr

H. David Starr MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines [, distilled spirits and liqueurs ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 26, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 25, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 16, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 6, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 16, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 14, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 29, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 9, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 8, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 13, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance