Drawing for BALLINO

USPTO serial 79009852

BALLINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3107070Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2006
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALLINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry R. Lipsitz, Douglas M. McAllister

BARRY R LIPSITZ DOUGLAS M MCALLISTER LIPSITZ & MCALLISTER LLCBLDG 8755 MAIN STMONROE, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Potting soil; growing media for plants, namely culturing substrates containing peat; growing media for plants, namely planting substrates; soil additives, namely soil nutrients; soil amendments, namely soil nutrients; soil improving agents, namely, soil nutrients; soil improving preparations, namely, soil nutrients; peat products in the form of fertilizers; fertilizers, solid and liquid; chemical fertilizers; chemical preparations for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, chemical preparations for the treatment of seeds; chemical soil conditionersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
005Chemical substances for protecting plants, namely acaricides, biopesticides, insecticides, and miticides for eradicating plant parasites; fungicides, herbicides, and pesticides for agricultural, commercial, industrial or domestic useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Mulch; wood-chips, wood-fibers, bark-fibers, and bark-chips for use as ground cover; seeds for horticultural purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 30, 2006DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 28, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance