Drawing for FLIP*FLOP

USPTO serial 79009898

FLIP*FLOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275302Status 707Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
—

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with FLIP*FLOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

Joseph T. Nabor Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ PERFUMERY, COSMETICS ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009[ SUN GLASSES; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND, IMAGES OR DATA ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
018LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER AND GOODS MADE OF THESE MATERIALS, NAMELY, WALLETS, PURSES, POUCHES, HANDBAGS, All PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS, SUITCASES, RUCKSACKS, TOILETRY BAGS SOLD EMPTY, BEAUTY CASES SOLD EMPTY, DOCUMENT CASES, SPORT BAGS, MATCH SACKS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS; TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKSACTIVE—
024TEXTILES, NAMELY, TEXTILE FABRICS FOR HOME AND OFFICE INTERIORS; TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, HAND, BATHING AND SAUNA TOWELS; TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, TABLE LINENS AND TABLE CLOTHSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, MASQUERADE COSTUMES, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, TOPS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, JACKETS, COATS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, JEANS, PANTS, SHORTS, SUITS, NECKERCHIEFS, TIES, BATHING SUITS; FOOTWEAR EXCLUDING SANDALS KNOWN AS FLIP-FLOPS; AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, SCARVES, AND KERCHIEFSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 11, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 27, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 1, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 14, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 14, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 22, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 5, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance