Drawing for HAMMERSTEIN

USPTO serial 79009918

HAMMERSTEIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3135986Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 29, 2006
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAMMERSTEIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Bain

Joseph W. Bain Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP525 Okeechobee BlvdFifteenth FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012parts of motor vehicles, namely, seats; parts of seats, namely, head rests for seats, metallic structures for seats, back rests for seats and seat lifters for seats; steering columns; [ window lifters for automobiles; ] and seat belt guidance for vehicle seats, namely, [ seat belts for use in vehicles, ] guide rings and guide blocks for seat belts [ and seat belt tensioners ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 22, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 25, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 25, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 22, 2013PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Mar 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 5, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance