Drawing for SMART HOPPING

USPTO serial 79009932

SMART HOPPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART HOPPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for transferring medical data; computer software for controlling and analyzing cardiac patient monitors, blood pressure monitors, pulse rate monitors; apparatus, namely personal digital assistants, personal computers for transferring medical dataSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Patient monitors, namely, heart monitors and ECG monitorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 15, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 5, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance