Drawing for LES ILES D'OR

USPTO serial 79009941

LES ILES D'OR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LES ILES D'OR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, toilet water, soaps, cosmetics, namely make-up, lipsticks, skin lotions, bath cream, bath gels, hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Sponges for applying body powder, bath products namely sea sponges, bathroom glass holder not of precious metal, perfume burners, hair brushes, hair combs, toilet brushesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 31, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 7, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 5, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance