USPTO serial 79009943
CHIPIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHIPIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GROUPE ZANIER
WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPIE DESIGN
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named CHIPIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |