USPTO serial 79009960
OENOSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3120920Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OENOSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
CHAZAY-D?AZERGUES, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
Joseph T. Nabor Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60603United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ METAL SEALING CAPSULES, METAL SEALING FOILS FOR WINE, FOOD, LIQUOR, CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND COSMETIC BOTTLES, POTS, TUBES, STICK PACKS, VIALS, CANS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | NON-METAL SEALS AND STOPPING SEALS FOR WINE, FOOD, LIQUOR, CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND COSMETIC BOTTLES, POTS, TUBES, STICK PACKS, VIALS, CANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ NON-METALLIC SEALING CAPSULES FOR WINE, FOOD, LIQUOR, CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND COSMETIC BOTTLES, POTS, TUBES, STICK PACKS, VIALS, CANS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by MANUFACTURE GENERALE DE JOINTS (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by SELIG FRANCE
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named OENOSEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |