USPTO serial 79009981
ROUGE TOMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3712132Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUGE TOMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
FREDERICK W MEYERS LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried and cooked fruits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ROUGE TOMATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |