Drawing for EFERAKI

USPTO serial 79010184

EFERAKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3229995Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFERAKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Raki, namely a kind of traditional distilled alcoholic drinkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 9, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance