USPTO serial 79010220
EMAMÒ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMAMÒ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |