Drawing for HARVARD CEMENT

USPTO serial 79010224

HARVARD CEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3209306Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 13, 2007
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with HARVARD CEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark P. Stone

Mark P. Stone Law Office of Mark P. Stone27 Waters EdgeChappaqua, NY 10514United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental cementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 5, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 18, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Mar 18, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 13, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 28, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance