Drawing for MENEGATTO

USPTO serial 79010225

MENEGATTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174270Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MENEGATTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Textile machines, namely, twisting machines, covering machines, winding machines, false twist texturing machines, air texturing machines, and man-made production apparatus, namely, textile scutching machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Drafting of projects, namely, drafting projects of twisting machines, covering machines, winding machines, false texturing machines, air texturing machines, fiber production apparatus; research for textile machinerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 11, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 13, 2012CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 30, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 22, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 16, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance