USPTO serial 79010232
CONCEPT K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCEPT K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NILS H LJUNGMAN
NILS H LJUNGMAN NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, men's, women's and children's clothing, namely jackets, vests, coats, pants, suits, fancy dresses, waistcoats, ties, bow ties, shirts, slacks, trousers, skirts, dresses, blouses, ladies' suits comprised of dress and jacket, sweaters, sweatshirts, stockings, socks, shoes, belts, hats, caps, leather hats and caps; Eveningwear, namely, dresses, suits, jackets, pants, tops, bottoms and tuxedos; Footwear; and Headwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |