Drawing for XALAR

USPTO serial 79010274

XALAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194324Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XALAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional supplements and nutritional supplement ingredients for food, all for medical purposes, namely salmon oil and marine-based extracts and oils for animal and human consumption; hydrolyzed protein and marine chondroitinSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
029salmon oil and marine-based extracts and oils used as food additives for human consumption; hydrolyzed protein and marine chondroitin for use as food additivesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031animal feed and non-medicated animal feed additivesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 23, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 19, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance