USPTO serial 79010277
APERIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3148886Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with APERIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | goods of metal and predominantly of metal and parts therefor, namely, metal locks and keys therefor and metal lock parts and accessories, namely, lock cases, lock cylinders, and lock striking plates; [ metal door frames and metal window frames, metal hinges and ] metal door handles; non-electronic emergency and panic devices for doors and windows, namely, metal latch bars, metal latches, metal push levers for opening doors and windows, metal door latching assemblies that release upon the application of force causing the door to move in the direction of exit travel; fittings and mountings for doors and windows as well as other door and window hardware, namely, metal lock escutcheons, [ metal padlocks, manually-operated metal door holders for holding doors open, ] metal dead bolts, [ metal hook bolts, ] metal latch bolts, metal knobs, metal push bars, metal levers, metal push plates, metal door trims, metal door panels, [ metal window pulleys, metal window screens, metal window stays, metal window fasteners, metal window handle operators, metal door holders, roller carriages for doors ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric, electronic and electromechanical locks and lock part sand accessories therefor, namely, electronic lock cylinders, electric striking plates, door magnets, electronic keys, electronic [ and magnetic ] key cards, access control cards and smart cards, key card readers, access control [ card readers ] and smart card readers all for the purpose of providing lock and secure entry functions; encoded electronic chip and magnetic identity cards for use in granting entrance and exit to dwellings and businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 28, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |