USPTO serial 79010278
VAL & MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3133255Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAL & MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, skirts, jackets, pants, T-shirts, shirts, sweaters, shorts, and dresses; woven and knitted clothing, namely, jumpers, sweaters, skirts, and dresses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |