USPTO serial 79010370
NOMIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOMIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, warm up suits, socks; Footwear; Headwear, namely, headbands, caps and hats | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings; gymnastic and sporting articles not included in other classes, namely, baseball bat grips, tennis racquet grips, hockey stick grips, Sports grips, namely, Squash rackets grips, cricket bat grips, badminton rackets grips, Lacrosse stitch grips, and golf clubs grips; Gloves, namely, baseball gloves, baseball batting gloves, batting gloves, bowling gloves, boxing gloves, gauntlets, namely, gloves for archery; goalkeepers' gloves, golf gloves, handball gloves, hockey gloves, karate gloves, racquet ball gloves, rugby gloves, sky diving gloves, softball gloves, water ski gloves, weight lifting gloves, windsurfing gloves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOTEC AG
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Jeremy Skirrow
- Other trademarks owned by Nomis Sports AG
- Other trademarks owned by Nomis Sports AG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NOMIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |