Drawing for ACCIAIERIE DI SICILIA

USPTO serial 79010390

ACCIAIERIE DI SICILIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211509Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
BEYER, ELIZABETH L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCIAIERIE DI SICILIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006COMMON METALS, NAMELY STEEL, IRON, CARBON STEELS, MANGANESE ORES, MOLYBDENUM ORES, NICKEL, TITANIUM, TUNGSTEN ORES, VANADIUM, AND THEIR ALLOYS; BUILDING MATERIALS OF METAL, NAMELY, REBARS, COILS, WIRE RODS, MESHES; TRANSPORTABLE BUILDINGS OF METAL; MATERIALS OF METAL FOR RAILWAY TRACKS; NON ELECTRIC CABLES AND WIRES OF COMMON METAL; IRONMONGERY AND SMALL ITEMS OF METAL HARDWARE, NAMELY PIPES OF METAL; METAL SAFES; ORES, NAMELY STEEL, IRON, CARBON STEELS, MANGANESE, MOLYBDENUM, NICKEL, TITANIUM, TUNGSTEN, VANADIUM; SEMI-FINISHED ARTICLES OF STEELSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 9, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 26, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance