USPTO serial 79010412
DRBD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3194325Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRBD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AT
LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LINBIT HA-Solutions GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DRBD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |