Drawing for PROGRESSIVE BOND

USPTO serial 79010447

PROGRESSIVE BOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171663Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE BOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAMSeven Times Square - 44th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003ABRASIVES, NAMELY, COATED ABRASIVES IN THE FORM OF BELTS, PAPER, CLOTH, DISCS, STRIPS, SHEETS, PADS, ROLLS AND STRINGS, FLEXIBLE ABRASIVES, ABRASIVE PAPER, ABRASIVE CLOTH, ABRASIVE DISKS, ABRASIVE SHEETS, ABRASIVE STRIPS, ABRASIVE PADS, ABRASIVE ROLLS AND ABRASIVE STRINGS FOR SANDING, GRINDING, SCULPTURING, FORMING, CARVING, SHARPENING AND RUBBINGSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 26, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 16, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 25, 2018CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 15, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 16, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 25, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 18, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 18, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 26, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance