Drawing for DANGOLD

USPTO serial 79010477

DANGOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194326Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANGOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria C.H. Lin

MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, iced milk, frozen yogurt, and ] cheeseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 13, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 21, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 21, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2008LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 21, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance