Drawing for ORMO EXCELLENCE IN QUALITY

USPTO serial 79010493

ORMO EXCELLENCE IN QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073830Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORMO EXCELLENCE IN QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Ropes, string, fabric and polyester mesh nets for household items, tents, awnings, canvas tarpaulins, sails, multipurpose cloth bags; padding and stuffing materials not of rubber or plastics; raw fibrous textile materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
023Yarns and threads, for textile useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 11, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 4, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 16, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 6, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance