Drawing for Serial No. 79010510

USPTO serial 79010510

Serial No. 79010510

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3107077Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2006
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79010510?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ray Thomas, Jr.

Ray Thomas, Jr. Law Office of Ray Thomas, Jr. PLLC1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW10th FloorWashington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021household containers and utensils made of porcelain, namely, china dish sets, dishes, salad bowls, plates, butter dishes, bowls, candlesticks, pitchers, vases, pots, flowerpot covers, coffee services sets, decanters, cheese-dish covers, egg cups, fruit bowls, molds for cake, pudding, tart, chocolate, pie and meat pie, flasks, flower holders, pans, vegetable dishes, pie servers, salt shakers, sugar bowls, cups, tea sets and teapotsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 20, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Aug 25, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance