Drawing for DEXXO

USPTO serial 79010529

DEXXO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEXXO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric motors, motor reducers for operating blinds, screens, curtains, shutters, windows, doors, garage doors, gates and gratingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electric or electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling, remote controlling the operating motors of blinds, screens, curtains, shutters, windows, doors, garage doors, gates and gratings; electric or electronic monitoring and alarm apparatus and instruments and their control devices for protection of people, goods and buildingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance