Drawing for APEX

USPTO serial 79010597

APEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233526Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with APEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH A. COMINOLLI

ELIZABETH A. COMINOLLI Markert & Cominolli PLLC100 S. Clinton Ave., 24th FloorRochester, NY 14604United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Heat exchangers being parts of machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 24, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 1, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 9, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 11, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 5, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
May 6, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 6, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 6, 201315AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
May 3, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2013E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 10, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2006IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance