USPTO serial 79010619
EOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2006
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
Weston, NSW 2611, AU
Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
AU
Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
AU
Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Krantz
Brian Krantz Sassoon & Cymrot LLP84 State St, Suite 820BOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electro optic fire controllers for weapons; laser range finders; satellite laser range finders; optical telescopes and observatories in the nature of telescopes; and space tracking systems, comprising software used to track satellites, space debris and other extraterrestrial objects, lasers, telescopes, and laser detectors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
- Other trademarks owned by Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd ACN 008 587 451
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |